Urban and Environmental Policy Program 


Prof. Robert Gottlieb
Fall 2005
M/W 8 - 9:25 am
Phone: 323-259-2712
Email: gottlieb@oxy.edu

UEP 410: Advanced Seminar in Urban and Environmental Policy

Background to the Seminar

The advanced seminar in urban and environmental policy (UEP 410) is organized around two sets of activities.  The first involves participation through the readings, seminar presentations and discussions, and speakers on major political, public policy, and planning issues. The second involves initiating work on senior projects -- the two-semester research and writing effort that should be considered the culmination of one’s academic work at Occidental. The work on the senior project during the fall has direct bearing on the work undertaken in the spring in UEP 411; that is, the work on the project in the fall is crucial to the overall process of completing a strong comps project. This academic year, due to sabbatical leaves, I’ll be teaching UEP 410 during the fall semester and Professor Dreier will be teaching UEP 411 in the spring. Getting started on the comps project in fall semester (i.e., picking a topic, developing your research question and hypothesis, and getting started on the research) will therefore be even more important this year in order to get substantial feedback on the comps from both of us.

The class time on Mondays will be divided into segments.  These will include discussions, presentations, and short writing assignments on the topics; presentations by speakers; and presentation groups. The Wednesday class will focus on the organization and development of the comps project, including selecting the topic, exploring whether you’ll want a client, identifying your research question, developing a research plan and time line, and beginning the research, including the semester paper which should become part of the overall comps.  We will also have sessions evaluating prior comps or thesis projects (every student will select a comps paper to present during the course of the semester) as well as teams of two students who will be presenting and evaluating each other’s initial research question and project topic. 

Topics and Readings

For the seminar aspect of the class, there will be four different areas and related topics, with readings, discussions, and presentation sessions organized around each area.  These include:

1.      Health Policy Issues (with a focus on the debates over tobacco policy and regulation, health and the built environment, and nutrition and obesity-related health issues).

2.      Media Influences (with a focus on how the media operate and are controlled, media influences on public policy, and where and how alternative media spaces are created)

3.      Politics and Governance (with a focus on the electoral process and voting, including the November special election in California and the initiative process; and broader issues about democratic participation and/or the lack thereof)

4.      Globalization and Empire (with a focus on the U.S. global reach and globalization issues, including food, labor and environmental issues in the global economy).

While these topics cover a lot of territory, the readings and the discussion/presentation sessions should provide some broad conceptual knowledge about these different policy areas as well as a specific focus on major contemporary issues or debates.

Each student will be assigned to a group to lead the discussions on one of the topics; however, discussion sessions will involve participation by the whole class. Everyone, of course, will be encouraged to do all the readings, but it will be the responsibility of the teams to organize their presentation sessions and solicit discussion as the seminar leaders for that segment of the class, using the readings as part of the discussion. I’ll also assign four short writing assignments related to the readings and topics. These assignments will allow students to choose one of four formats to raise key points and perspectives related to the topic. These include a 700 word op ed; a two-three page concept paper for a grant proposal; a two-three page memo to others in an organization on how to approach the topic/issue areas; and a two-three page policy brief. Each of the four formats will be utilized for the writing assignments.

Speakers and Films

For each of the topics, there will be a speaker elaborating on the themes associated with the topic.  Speaker sessions should be lively and interactive. We may also have films related to one or more of the topical areas.

Developing the Senior Projects

This is an important segment of the class.  There will be several hard deadlines established for the development of the senior project during the fall semester, with a paragraph, short memo, or outline of the work due by the dates listed below.  These include:

Selection of Project Topic (deadline September 28)

Selection of the research question; initial bibliography (deadline: October 12);

Initial work plan and research strategy (deadline: November 9);

Final work plan and research strategy (deadline: November 30);

Presentations of research to date (December 5 and December 7);

Completion of research paper/section of comps (deadline: December 12). 

We will devote class time on Wednesdays for group and individual discussions on the process and substance of the research for your senior projects.  We will also discuss the mechanics of pulling together a successful senior project, including a review of other comps projects. Each student will review at least one of these projects and discuss both the substance and form of the project as part of the senior project discussion sessions. There will also be a presentation/discussion session led by each student concerning the topic that they have selected, the research questions that need to be addressed, and the policy issues involved. The initial work plan should provide a detailed time line and initial literature search.  The final work plan should also include a description of the range of research sources and materials that will be used. The final research paper should be directly related to your senior project.  It could be the introductory chapter of your overall senior project, which would include a preliminary literature review and discussion of the broad themes and research questions. It could also take the form of a “work in progress,” but this work in progress must include some preliminary substantive work. The presentations should provide an overview of the research paper/work in progress paper.

Grading Criteria

Final grades will reflect the work in each of the segments.  These include: participation in readings, presentation sessions, class discussions and development of senior project, including meeting deadlines – 40%; writing assignments – 30%; final paper – 30%.

Class Organization

I’ve organized each class session by date according to topic, readings, debate sessions, and senior project sessions.  Mondays will be generally dedicated to the seminar topics; Wednesdays to the senior project. My office hours will also be on Mondays (10:00-11:00 and 1-2) and Wednesdays (10:00-11:00 and 1-2), but I will be on campus and available to meet with you most other days if you need to see me and we are able to work out a time.  Please feel free to contact me above and beyond any formal office visit, particularly on the progress of the senior project.

Readings and Topics.

TOPIC: Health Policies: (Tobacco and Obesity, Nutrition and the Physical Environment)

Session #1 August 31-September 28

Readings:

Tobacco (August 31- September 12)

“The Politics of Tobacco Regulation in the U.S.,” Robert Kagan and William Nelson in Regulating Tobacco, Edited by Robert Rabin and Stephen Sugarman, pp. 11-38

“The Ordinary Politics of Legislation”, Chapter 2, pp. 8-26; “The Changed Context of Policymaking,” (Chapter 6, pp. 93-118); and “Chronology of Cigarette Regulation” (pp. 249-255), in Up in Smoke: From Legislation to Litigation in Tobacco Politics, Martha Derthick.

“Anti-Smoking Effort Sees Progress,” Sharon Bernstein, Los Angeles Times, January 26, 2005

 “Addicted to Tobacco,” Tommy J. Payne, Los Angeles Times, June 18, 2003

“The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General: Executive Summary,” May 27, 2004, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr/sgr_2004/pdf/executivesummary.pdf

“Cigarettes, Taxes and Thin French Women,” Daniel Gross, New York Times, July 24, 2005

Obesity, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Built Environment (September 21-October 3)

 “Starting Early: Underage Consumers,” (Chapter 8) and “Pushing Soft Drinks,” (Chapter 9) in Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health, Marion Nestle, pp. 175-218

“Thirst for Profit,” Michele Simon, Mothering, March-April 2005

“Obesity: A Weighty Issue for Children,” Charles W. Schmidt, Environmental Health Perspectives, October 2003, pp. A700-A707

“Relationship between Urban Sprawl and Physical Activity, Obesity, and Morbidity,” Reid Ewing et al, in American Journal of Health Promotion, September/October 2003, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 47-57 in http://www.rwjf.org/publications/publicationsPdfs/AJHP18Ewing47-57.pdf

“How the Built Environment Affects Physical Activity: Views from Urban Planning,” Susan Handy et al., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2002, pp. 64-73

“McDonald’s is Rolling out a Healthier Image,” Claire Hoffman, Los Angeles Times, June 17, 2005

“Striking Back at the Food Police,” Melanie Warner, New York Times, June 12, 2005

“The Food Industry Empire Strikes Back,” Melanie Warner, New York Times, July 7, 2005

“Girth of a Nation” and “Free to Choose Obesity?”, Paul Krugman, July 4, 2005 and July 8, 2005

TOPIC: Media Influences: Narrowing the Field; Budding Alternatives

Session 2: October 10-October 17

The Problem of the Media (October 10)

The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communications Politics in the 21st Century, Robert McChesney, 2003, Chapters 1-3, and 6-7, pp. 7-137; 210-297

“Objectivity is Highly Overrated,” Victor Navasky, Los Angeles Times, April 24, 2004

“”Don’t Follow the Money,” and “The Armstrong Williams News Hour,” Frank Rich, New York Times, June 12, 2005 and June 26, 2005 (Assignment: Please read additional Frank Rich columns in Sunday New York Times “Week in Review” section during October)

Searching for Alternatives (October 17)

“Million-Word March for Media Reform,” Danny Schecter, May 19, 2005, Alternet (http://www.alternet.org/story/22049)

“Congress Tunes In,” Robert McCheshney, John Nichols and Ben Scott, The Nation, May 23, 2005

“The Power of People’s Media,” Jim Hightower, June 16, 2004, available at: http://www.alternet.org/story/18966/

TOPIC: Current Political Debates: Special Elections and state and local politics; The Vanishing Voter; Electoral Democracy (or the Lack thereof); the Role of Social Movements

Session #3 – October 24- November 7

Readings

Voting and Elections (October 25)

“The Incredible Shrinking Electorate” (Chapter 1), pp. 3-22; “Parties and Candidates: Politics of the Moment,” (Chapter 2), 23-62, “Election Day: The Politics of Inequity,” (Chapter 5), pp. 128-145, in The Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty, Thomas Patterson, 2002

“Winner Takes Nothing,” (Chapter 15, pp278-297) in Fixing Elections: The Failure of America’s Winner Take All Politics, Steven Hill.

“Voter Participation: A Brief Literature Review,” Jessica Roberts, California Voter Participation Survey, 2004, http:www.calvoter.org/issues/votereng/votpart/review.html

“Smoothing the Way to the Polls,” Kafi Blumenfield, Los Angeles Times, May 14, 2005

Alternatives (November 1)

“Democracy and Participation Agenda for Los Angeles,” Report of the Progressive Los Angeles Network, 2001

“America’s Signature Exclusion: How Democracy is Made Safe for the Two-Party System,” Chapter 5 in James B. Raskin, Overruling Democracy, pp. 91-116

“Urban Archipelago: Progressive Cities in a Conservative Sea,” John Nichols, and “Cities: The Vital Core,” Joel Rogers, in The Nation, June 20, 2005

TOPIC: Globalization and Empire

Session #4: November 14-November 28

Globalization (November 14-21)

“The New System,” Thomas Friedman, Chapter 1 in The Lexus and the Olive Tree, 1999, pp. 3-15

“It’s a Flat World, After All,” Thomas Friedman, New York Times, April 3, 2005

“Globalization is Doing a World of Good for U.S.,” James Flanigan, Los Angeles Times, April 24, 2004

“The Myths of Globalization Exposed: Advancing toward Living Democracy,” Vandana Shiva, Chapter 9 in Worlds Apart: Globalization and the Environment, James Gustave Speth, pp. 141-154

“A Tale of Three Logos: The Swoosh, the Shell, and the Arches,” in No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies, Naomi Klein, pp. 365-396

“Cutting Here, But Hiring Over There,” Steve Lohr, New York Times, June 24, 2005

“Controlling the Global Obesity Epidemic,” and “Nutrition in Transition: Globalization and its Impact on Nutrition Patterns and Diet-related Diseases,” World Health Organization available at www.who.int/nut/obs.htm and http://www.who.int/nut/trans.htm

“Striking the Golden Arches: French Farmers Protest McD’s Globalization,” David Morse, in McDonaldization: The Reader, George Ritzer, editor, pp. 245-249

“Mexico Confronts Sudden Surge in Obesity,” Elisabeth Malkin, New York Times, June 29, 2005

“State Laws Take Back Seat to Trade,” Evelyn Iritani, Los Angeles Times, December 5, 2004

Presentation Sessions: December 5-December 7